Program review two-year timeline

All of our academic programs are on a review schedule that aligns with the two-year timeline found below. 

Timeframe	Description
Year 1, April	Proposed Internal Assessment Team form submitted to CIQE
Year 1, May	Overview Meeting hosted by CIQE
Year 1, June to August	Review and enhancement of Program Learning Outcomes
Year 1, August	CIQE to send data to Assessment Team Work on Self-Study draft begins
Year 1, November	List of potential External Reviewers submitted to the CIQE for review by Provost
Year 1, December	Draft of Self-Study completed and presented to CIQE and subsequently presented to Faculty Council for review External Reviewers contacted by CIQE
Year 2, January	Revisions to Self-Study completed Final Self-Study and cover letters provided by Dean to CIQE
Year 2, February	Self-Study and supporting documents sent to External Reviewers by CIQE
Year 2, March	Site visit by External Reviewers
Year 2, April	External Reviewers Report submitted
Year 2, May to June	Feedback on ERR solicited from program faculty and IAT Preparation of Program and Decanal responses to ERR and Implementation Plan (IP) Feedback on IP solicited through Faculty Council
Year 2, July to August	IP reviewed by Academic Resource Committee (ARC) Preparation of Final Assessment Report (FAR) and Executive Summary (ES) by CIQE
Year 2, September to November	Reports to USC/GSC, Executive, Academic Council and Board of Governors
Year 3, July	Report to Quality Council

If you would like an accessible version of the review timeline, please contact ciqe@ontariotechu.ca.