Space principles and needs
The university’s space assumptions are based on the standards set by the Council of Ontario Universities (COU). These benchmarks may represent a target to achieve, a minimum to meet, a maximum not to exceed, an optimum to strive for, or a guideline to use as a benchmark. Based on 2022 data, Ontario Tech had approximately 75 per cent of the calculated need for core academic space (e.g. teaching, research and academic support) compared to the system average of more than 82 per cent. Our desire is not to exactly match COU figures, but to apply them alongside internal factors to shape a balanced, resource-conscious space model.
As we plan for future growth, we focus on the number of courses students take on campus and the related demand for research and academic support. We use two common methods to measure student enrolment. Headcount includes every registered student, regardless of their course load. Full-time equivalent (FTE) reflects the share of a full course load each student takes, for example, a student is enrolled in eight courses (of the normal 10-course load) is counted as 0.8 FTE. In September 2024, our headcount surpassed 11,000 students, which we estimate equals approximately 9,500 FTEs.
Another important concept in space planning is the distinction between gross square feet (GSFs) and net assignable square feet (NASFs). GSF refers to all floor space within a building, measured to the exterior walls. This includes non-assignable areas such as elevators, hallways, mechanical rooms and atria. NASF includes only interior spaces designated for use by units or functions. As of 2022, the university’s total building footprint exceeded 1.15 million GSF, comparable to 2019 levels. While we added Shawenjigewining Hall in 2021, we also exited several leased and temporary spaces, including 11 Simcoe, St Gregory’s, Library portable and J-Block.
Space Type |
2022 Inventory |
% I / G |
2019 Inventory |
% I / G |
2016 Inventory |
% I / G |
||
Classroom |
87,287 |
80.4 |
92,489 |
90.4 |
80,552 |
80.4 |
||
Class Lab |
72,813 |
76.9 |
75,287 |
78.4 |
68,774 |
58.9 |
||
Research |
91,863 |
78.2 |
93,073 |
84.9 |
77,912 |
78.0 |
||
Office - Academic & Admin |
139,511 |
79.6 |
140,723 |
84.1 |
126,901 |
83.3 |
||
Library Facilities & Study |
36,754 |
55.9 |
36,931 |
59.6 |
39,892 |
64.6 |
||
Collab & Study |
26,345 |
67.4 |
17,029 |
46.2 |
10,404 |
28.8 |
||
TOTAL: |
454,573 |
75.7 |
455,532 |
79.3 |
404,435 |
71.3 |
As noted, several strategic enrolment paths could lead to 18,000 students. We must explore different space scenarios depending on whether growth emphasizes programs that require significant tutorial and lab support, or those delivered through executive-style formats on evenings and weekends. To guide high-level planning, we can use simple averages. For instance, if 15,000 students were enrolled in traditional programs and 3,000 in continuing education delivered online or during off-peak hours, we would require an additional 300,000 GSF (roughly equivalent to three buildings the size of the Energy Research Centre) to maintain our current space ratios. This estimate can vary based on program mix, the research profile of new faculty, and the location of future buildings. A facility that connects to existing infrastructure may require less space than one that anchors a new location and must support its future expansion. Space demand may decrease if hybrid learning models expand or rooms are more frequently shared. Conversely, we may need more space if academic support services, student study areas or major research initiatives increase.